My car was stolen in October 2008, the car was recovered a few days later, some parts were missing. I have been through hell and back with State Farm. I have complied with them, all of the information they have asked me for i have given to them. I have been through all of the interrogations, I’ve gone twice to the investigations under oath with their attorney. I have provided them with the key to the car, i have also provided them with my cell phone records, a receipt of the movie the where i was when i car was stolen, all types of information ,and i have even answered their stupid questions that have no sense. Even information on the person gave me a ride home that night. I also had to give them my babysittters information cause they wanted to verify that she was really taking care of my kids. Basically i have given them all they have asked for, it’s now been 7 MONTHS and still no response from them . . . I have never received single letter from State Farm. I now have hired an attorney to handle the claim. He’s made several attempts to contact the person in charge of the claim and a good 7 weeks have gone by and she will not respond. Last week he finally got a hold of her and she stated that they are still taking a look at it . I have now hired another attorney besides the one i already have to
sue them . What type of investigation takes 7 months. What are they doing ? I mean come on i understand that they must do their job and thats fine but 7 months seems like a bit to much . 7 months is well over half a year they have had more than enough time to do all they have needed. Does anyone know the time frame they have to pay a recovered car? What do u guys think in reference to this? Do i have a case ???
Why or why not?
August 28, 2009: “Phillip Garrido and his wife, Nancy, will face 29 felony counts after being accused of kidnapping Jaycee Lee Dugard when she was 11 and keeping her in their backyard since 1991…
Dugard lived for 18 years in a shed and other outbuildings behind her abductor’s house, where she gave birth to two girls whom he fathered; the girls are now 11 and 15, police said…”http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/08/28/cali…
January 15, 2007: “O’REILLY: I’m not buying this. If you’re 11 years old or 12 years old, 13, and you have a strong bond with your family, OK, even if the guy threatens you, this and that, you’re riding your bike around, you got friends. The kid didn’t go to school. There’s all kinds of stuff. If you can get away, you get away. All right? If you’re 11.
[...]
O’REILLY: This is what I believe happened in the Hearst case and in this case. The situation that Hearst found herself in was exciting. She had a boring life. She was a child of privilege. All of a sudden, she’s in with a bunch of charismatic thugs, and she enjoyed it. The situation here for this kid looks to me to be a lot more fun than what he had under his old parents. He didn’t have to go to school. He could run around and do whatever he wanted…”http://mediamatters.org/research/2007011…
Recent Comments